Half of Directly Placed Display Ads In View For At Least 1 Second in H1

August 29, 2012

adsafe-visibility-of-display-ads-in-h1-aug-2012.png49.9% of directly placed ads stayed in-view for at least 1 second in H2, according to an August 2012 study from AdSafe Media. Viewability for directly placed ads was better than for networks (41.2%) and platforms/exchanges (40.3%). Longer engagement with viewers was much harder to come by: just 21.1% of directly placed ads remained in-view for 15 seconds, dropping to 16.4% for networks and 16.3% for exchanges.

In its previous semi-annual report, AdSafe found that more than 38% of display ads were either not in-view at all to their intended user or in-view for less than half a second, the standard time accepted for an ad view. The latest study notes that earlier reports measured viewability data against a requirement of 75% of the creative to be in-view to the user, while the August report adopts 3MS guidelines, with the standard for a viewable impression being 50% of the ad creative in-view.

Vertically-Oriented Ads More Visible

Details from AdSafe’s most recent “Semiannual Review” indicate that viewability is better for vertically oriented (160×600 – Skyscraper) ads, with an average of 53.1% in-view for at least 1 second, highest for the direct channel (68.1%) and lowest for the exchange channel (51.9%). There is a significant drop-of in overall viewability rates to the other formats measured: 38.4% for 300×250 ads, and 36.1% for 720×90 ads.

Examining the data by browser, the report finds that there is very little variance in the percentage of ads in-view for 1 second across Chrome, Internet Explorer, Firefox, and Safari. In terms of the percentage of ads visible for 15 seconds, Internet Explorer takes the lead at 18.6%, with Chrome bringing up the rear at 15.2%.

Religious Sites Still Get Most Visibility

As in the previous report, religion and spirituality sites demonstrated the highest level of engagement, with an average in-view time of more than 5 seconds, closely followed by home and garden sites. Overall, there was little difference in visibility between content and utility sites, both at around an average of 2 seconds. Travel, careers and health performed best among utility sites, while autos had the lowest visibility. For content sites, news led the pack, with finance by far the worst, at less than 1 second average visibility.

Risky Content – Mostly Moderate – Rises in Q2

For publishers, the overall proportion of risky content (impressions that represent a low degree of brand safety) increased 8% quarter-over-quarter in Q4 to represent 5.3% of all impressions, with the majority of those deemed moderate risk (3.1% of total impressions). The proportion of risky content remained steady at 5.8% for exchanges, though in Q2 the proportion of impressions deemed very high risk dropped from 3.4% to 2.5%.

For networks, the percentage of impressions deemed risky rose from 6.3% to 7.3%, though much of that rise was attributable to an increase in moderate risk impressions, as very high risk impressions fell.

Illegal Downloads, Adult Content Become More Prevalent

Illegal downloads (33.9% of high-risk impressions for publishers) and adult content (33.6% for publishers) accounted for roughly 45-65% of high-risk content across the channels in Q1 and Q2, a dramatic rise from late 2011. Offensive language, which was the main offender back then (see link above) became less prominent.

Alcohol impressions rose quarter-over-quarter in each channel, to 27.2% of high-risk impressions for publishers, 15.3% for exchanges, and 20.4% for networks.

Other Findings:

  • The UK received the largest amount of the US’ non-geo-targeted content, at 26.3% in Q2, up from 20.5% in Q1. Canada, which had received a leading 50% of such impressions in Q1, dropped to 13% in Q2.
  • Australia saw its share of non-geo-targeted content jump from 1.8% in Q4 2011 to 12% in Q1 and 10.3% in Q2 2012.

About the Data: To obtain its results, AdSafe analyzed over 1 billion impressions per day that came through its systems.

Chart-Library-Ad-1

Explore More Articles.

Which Skills Are Important in RevOps?

Which Skills Are Important in RevOps?

9 in 10 RevOps professionals view data analysis skills as being important, a high percentage also don’t believe they need this skill for their job.

Marketing Charts Logo

Stay on the cutting edge of marketing.

Sign up for our free newsletter.

You have Successfully Subscribed!

Pin It on Pinterest

Share This