Marketers who rate the ability of their companies’ SEO strategy to achieve important objectives as very successful (“Superior Strategy”) show some different priorities than those who deem their strategies to not be successful (“Inferior Strategy”), according to [download page] a report from Ascend2 conducted in partnership with Research Underwriters. One of the most obvious differences between the groups is in their approach to social media integration: 38% of those with a “superior strategy” describe their integration of social with SEO strategy and tactics as extensive, compared to just 2% of those with an “inferior strategy.” Moreover, while just 5% of those with a “superior strategy” say they are not integrated, fully half of the “inferior strategy” group have no integration at all.
The connection between social and search has been noted a few times recently: a Searchmetrics study found social signals to be the highest correlating factors with Google rankings, while a BrightEdge survey showed 8 in 10 search marketers believing that social sharing of content will be a more important means to improve rank this year than last.
So how else do successful SEO strategists differ from their struggling counterparts? The study suggests that those with a “superior strategy” are:
The two groups do of course share some common beliefs, with both saying that: improving organic search rankings is their top objective; the lack of budget and/or headcount is their top obstacle; updating website content is an effective SEO tactic; and website visitor traffic and trend is a useful metric.
About the Data: The “SEO Strategy Outlook Survey” was fielded during the week of June 24, 2013 among 594 business leaders, marketing executives and marketing practitioners from around the world.
Subscribe now to receive more charts and articles like this each day in your inbox. A fast read in a clean, mobile-friendly design.